That is why we confirm the district court in every respect. The requirement for a “voluntary” execution of the agreement relates to the pressure exerted on the party when fewer assets enter the relationship. By nature, marital agreements are usually signed during emotional periods, and the party with fewer assets may be vulnerable to coercion or pressure to accept asset separation. Any finding of undue hardship imposed on the signatory at the time of signing invalidates the contract. An antenuptial agreement is a contract between two people in dercontemplation and Reflection on Marriage. Marriage offers the necessary reflection to engage both parties. The main purpose of these agreements is to define and define the respective property rights of the spouses before marriage. The challenges of these agreements usually arise with the death of one of the parties or in the event of dissolution of the marriage, as in this case.
Most jurisdictions now see positive antenuptial agreements, and validity is generally confirmed on this policy analysis: Antenuptial contracts between an adult man and an adult woman in The Examination of Marriage are favored by law, because they tend to promote domestic happins and adapt property issues that might otherwise become the relentlessness of many disputes.  Reviewing the testimony in the light most favourable to the woman, we cannot say that the district court does not give full effect on the marital agreement by concluding that the husband titled the status in the name of wife, because he intended to give it to her. Implicitly, in the Court`s findings, the conclusion is that the presumption of a gift was not overcome by the evidence of the husband directed on this subject.